Bell OH- 5. 8 Kiowa Warrior . Army and the Army National Guard (ANG) operate Kiowa Warriors.
The OH- 5. 8D is powered by a single Rolls- Royce. T7. 03- AD- 7. 00. A (M2. 50- C3. 0R/3). While the OH- 5. 8 is designed to fly about 1. As a result of the heavy use of the OH- 5. Iraq and Afghanistan. Do. D's decision in October 2.
ARH- 7. 0 Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter program - the replacement aircraft for the OH- 5. Kiowa Warrior underwent major upgrades and modifications, including the Cockpit And Sensor Upgrade Program (CASUP) and Weight Reduction Program. The armed aerial scout mission will instead.
The FY 2016 Budget includes $4.9 billion in total resources for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), an increase of $425 million, or 9 percent, above FY 2015. Of this increase, $148 million is in budget. Budget 2014 - Annex 2 - Tax Measures: Supplementary Information, Notices of Ways and Means Motions and Draft Amendments to Various GST/HST Regulations. Chapter 5.2 of Budget 2015 highlights the federal government's economic forecast.
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts: Linking the Provider Recommendation to Adolescent HPV Vaccine Uptake (R01) PAR-16-338. Federal Awarding Agency Regulatory Implementation of Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. EU spending programmes for 2014-2020: description, amounts, legal bases.
MQ- 1. C Gray Eagle. RQ- 7 Shadow. until a permanent replacement has been found. It is estimated, the Army will be able to meet 8. Apaches and UAVs. Do. D CASUP and Weight Reduction Program (terminated): The OH- 5. D Cockpit And Sensor Upgrade Program (CASUP) was a program to address additional capabilities. Army's day/night.
The CASUP converted the OH- 5. D to the OH- 5. 8F configuration. Further, the CASUP will replace the mast mounted sight with an advanced nose- mounted sensor, and other weight and obsolescence.
The new sensor, the Raytheon. AN/AAS- 5. 3 Common Sensor Payload, includes cutting- edge sensing technologies such as an advanced infrared camera. Electro- Optical camera and an image intensifier. The program also increased system reliability and reduced support costs. Efforts included removing obsolete and extraneous hardware. Full Authority Digital Engine Control.
FADEC) system, replacing the legacy MFDs with lightweight versions, providing a lighter weight and better positioned common transponder, improved . Hellfire missile launchers, the AN/AAR- 5. Common Missile Warning System (CMWS) from BAE Systems. Health Usage Monitoring System (HUMS). The Army planned to eventually field 3. OH- 5. 8F Kiowa Warriors. Armament/Weapons: The Kiowa Warrior is equipped with two universal quick- change weapons pylons.
For more detail, see specifications below. Price/Unit Cost: In FY 2. OH- 5. 8D(R) costs $1. Mission/Role: The aircraft operates autonomously at standoff ranges providing armed reconnaissance, command and control. AH- 6. 4 Apache. attack helicopters and other airborne weapons platforms in day, night, and. FY 2. 01. 4 Do. D Program: The FY 1. Budget provides $1.
War Replacement Aircraft (WRA). M to support the OH- 5. Cockpit and Sensor Upgrade Program (CASUP). Department of Defense (Do. D), Bell Helicopter (Textron),and Rolls- Royce plc.
Last Update: June 6, 2. Download Official U. S. Department of Defense (Do.
Bundesverfassungsgericht - Decisions. FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURT - 2 Bv. R 2. 72. 8/1. 3 - - 2 Bv.
R 2. 72. 9/1. 3 - - 2 Bv. R 2. 73. 0/1. 3 - - 2 Bv. R 2. 73. 1/1. 3 - - 2 Bv.
E 1. 3/1. 3 - I. Karl Albrecht Schachtschneider,Treiberpfad 2. Berlin . 2 TFEU before the Court of Justice.
European Union against the purchase of government. Member States of the euro area by the European. System of Central Banks and the European Central Bank. Central Bank loans if those acts serve the. Christoph Degenhart,Burgstra. Bernhard Kempen. Rheinblick 1, 5. Remagen/Oberwinter.
Kerber,Hackescher Markt 4, 1. Berlin - . against the Decision of the Governing Council of.
European Central Bank of 6. Applicant: Parliamentary group DIE LINKE in the. German Bundestag,represented by its Chairman Dr. Gregor Gysi, Md. B,Platz der Republik 1, 1. Berlin. - authorised representatives. Prof. Hans- Peter Schneider,Drosselweg 4, 3.
Hanover. Prof. Norbert Lammert. Md. B,Platz der Republik 1, 1. Berlin. - authorised representatives.
Prof. Christian Calliess. Prof. Martin Nettesheim,Horemer 1.
T. Norbert Lammert. Md. B,Platz der Republik 1, 1.
Berlin. - authorised representatives. Prof. Christian Calliess. Prof. Martin Nettesheim,Horemer 1. T. Angela. Merkel,Bundeskanzleramt, Willy- Brandt- Stra.
The proceedings are suspended. II. Pursuant to Article 1. Treaty. on European Union and Article 2. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the. Court of Justice of.
European Union for a preliminary ruling: a) Is the Decision of the Governing Council of the. European Central Bank of 6 September 2. Technical. Features of Outright Monetary Transactions incompatible. Article 1. 19 and Article 1. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and with.
Articles 1. 7 to 2. Protocol on the Statute of the.
European System of Central Banks and of the European. Central Bank, because it exceeds the European Central.
Bank? Facts of the Case In a reasonable assessment of their. I to IV via constitutional complaints pursuant. Art. 4a of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz . BVerf. GG, first, inter. German Bundesbank in the implementation of the Decision of.
Governing Council of the European Central Bank of 6. September 2. 01. 2 on Technical Features of Outright Monetary. Transactions, and secondly, that the German Federal.
Government and the German Bundestag failed. Decision of the Governing Council of the. European Central Bank of 6 September 2. Technical. Features of Outright Monetary Transactions (hereinafter: OMT. Decision). Subject Matter of the Proceedings The OMT Decision envisages that government. Member States can be purchased up to an. Member States, at.
European Financial Stability Facility or the. European Stability Mechanism. The stated aim of the Outright. Monetary Transactions is to safeguard an appropriate monetary. The Minutes of the 3. These will be known as Outright Monetary Transactions. OMTs) and will be conducted within the following.
Conditionality A necessary condition for Outright Monetary. Transactions is strict and effective conditionality attached. European Financial Stability.
Facility/European Stability Mechanism (EFSF/ESM) programme. The involvement of the IMF shall also be sought. The Governing Council will consider Outright. Monetary Transactions to the extent that they are warranted.
Following a thorough assessment, the Governing. Council will decide on the start, continuation and suspension. Outright Monetary Transactions in full discretion and. Coverage Outright Monetary Transactions will be. EFSF/ESM macroeconomic. They may also be considered for Member.
States currently under a macroeconomic adjustment programme. Transactions will be focused on the shorter. No ex ante quantitative limits are set on the.
Outright Monetary Transactions. Creditor treatment The Eurosystem intends to clarify in the legal. Outright Monetary Transactions that it accepts. Eurosystem through Outright Monetary.
Transactions, in accordance with the terms of such bonds. Sterilisation The liquidity created through Outright Monetary. Transactions will be fully sterilised. Transparency Aggregate Outright Monetary Transaction.
Publication of the average duration of Outright. Monetary Transaction holdings and the breakdown by country.
Securities Markets. Programme Following today. The liquidity injected through the SMP. SMP portfolio will be held to maturity. The OMT Decision has not yet been put into. II. History of the Proceedings 1.
Submissions of the Complainants and the. Applicant The complainants and the applicant argue that.
Federal Government and the German Bundestag are obliged to work towards a repeal of the. OMT Decision, or at least to prevent its implementation, and.
German Bundesbank may not take part. Decision is put into effect. They give the following.
The OMT Decision is a so- called. It is not covered by the. European Central Bank pursuant to. Art. The. purchase of government bonds is only permitted within the. For a number of reasons.
OMT Decision is not an act of monetary policy. Monetary policy must relate to the entire euro. Member States of the Eurosystem. At the. same time, linking OMT purchases to decisions of the European. Financial Stability Facility or of the European Stability. Mechanism and to the conditionalities agreed to therein.
European Central Bank. The OMT Decision amounts to a. Treaties. The European Central Bank does not have a mandate. Member States; in this.
The transfer of sovereign powers to the. European Central Bank has only been politically. GG, and. impairs the constitutional identity of the Basic Law, which. Art. 3 GG protects not. Constitution but also against.
European integration. Statements Submitted by the European. Central Bank and the German Bundesbank In the proceedings before the Federal. Constitutional Court, the European Central Bank and the. German Bundesbank have submitted. Its monetary policy is.
Member States of. In particular, the link. Unfounded fears of investors with regard to the. The Outright Monetary Transactions were. The requirement for the. OMT Decision. is that the benefitting Member State has entered into.
European Financial Stability Facility or. European Stability Mechanism on macroeconomic.
The Outright Monetary. Transactions are only intended to cut off unjustified. If a Member State does not comply with. Member State concerned.
Another condition is that the Member. State has, or regains, access to the bond market so that the.
The European Central Bank further states that. Eurosystem will not claim preferred creditor status with. OMT Decision. While the European Central Bank objects to.
Member States concerned, it would accept. The European Central Bank argues that.
Spanish, Italian, Irish and Portuguese bonds. OMT Decision would currently amount to approximately.
EUR 5. 24. The European System of Central Banks does not. The European Central Bank further states that. The exact locking period.
The European Central Bank further argues that. OMT Decision can be based on Art. The purchase of government bonds on the secondary. Member States independent from the financial. Moreover, the European System of. Central Banks is called upon to support the general economic.
European Union to the extent that this does. However, the. European Central Bank is independent in this respect. Art. According to the European Central Bank, there. European System of Central Banks has ensured sufficient risk. If losses. occur nevertheless, they can be carried forward and balanced. According to the German.
Bundesbank , interest spreads on government. A poorer economic development in a Member State.
The fact that a. disruption to the monetary policy transmission mechanism. Member State does not comply with its. European Financial. Stability Facility or the European Stability Mechanism shows. OMT Decision is in fact not about the effectiveness.
The German Bundesbank argues. The sooner such purchases are made. Moreover, a large- scale purchase of government. Member State. The German Bundesbank further. German federal. budget, so that the risks ensuing from purchases of. Eurosystem are no different, in.
European Stability. Mechanism. Unlike the European Stability Mechanism, the. Eurosystem, however, lacks parliamentary monitoring.
Relevant Legal Provisions and Jurisprudence 1. Legal Provisions The relevant Articles of the Basic Law for the. Federal Republic of Germany of 2. May 1. 94. 9, most recently.
Act Amending the Basic Law (5. A translation of. Basic Law provided by the Federal Ministry of Justice and. Consumer Protection can be found online: http: //www. It shall be exercised by the people through elections. Within the framework. European Union, its responsibilities and powers may be.
European Central Bank, which is. Jurisprudence of the Federal Constitutional. Court a) In its established case- law, the Federal. Constitutional Court interprets these provisions so that they. Federal Republic of Germany. According to the jurisprudence which was.
Maastricht. judgment, the individual. GG has also a substantive content: BVerf. GE 8. 9, 1. 55 < 1. The guarantee also covers the. Germans. entitled to vote are guaranteed a subjective right to partake. Bundestag and to. GG in. conjunction with Art.
GG declares it. inviolable. This substantive content of what is guaranteed. BVerf. GE. 8. 9, 1. The right to vote does not serve to monitor the. BVerf. GE 1. 29, 1. BVerf. G, Order of the First Chamber of the Second Senate of 1.
April 2. 01. 3 . 1 GG, and in the. An essential. element of this programme of integration is the principle of. Against this background, actions of.
European Union have a. Federal Republic of Germany only within.
BVerf. GE 8. 9, 1. BVerf. GE 5. 8, 1 < 3. This implies that subsequent. Union Treaty and to its powers to act are no longer. Act of Assent to this Treaty (cf. BVerf. GE 5. 8. 1 < 3. Mosler in: Handbuch des.
Staatsrechts, Vol. Thus, if. European agencies or institutions were to administer the. Union Treaty, or develop it by judicial interpretation, in a. Treaty as it underlies. Act of Assent, the ensuing legislative instruments would. German sovereignty. The Federal Constitutional Court thus examines.